<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: communic8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/</link>
	<description>a collection of things worth sharing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: media myopia &#171; eskimon</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>media myopia &#171; eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] we must adopt a more strategic approach to planning, based on the things we want to share, who we want to share it with, and what&#8217;s important and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we must adopt a more strategic approach to planning, based on the things we want to share, who we want to share it with, and what&#8217;s important and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the flawed opposition of medium vs. message &#171; eskimon</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>the flawed opposition of medium vs. message &#171; eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] than being in opposition, both elements need to be carefully woven together: we&#8217;ve seen before that the most effective communications deliver the right message to the right people in the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than being in opposition, both elements need to be carefully woven together: we&#8217;ve seen before that the most effective communications deliver the right message to the right people in the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new media &#171; eskimon</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>new media &#171; eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned before that I believe advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned before that I believe advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eskimon</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-148</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right Phil - advertising&#039;s ultimate aim must be to drive bottom-line success. If communications don&#039;t help an organisation to survive, they are simply a cost to be cut.

However, I still believe that advertising&#039;s role is to influence the cognitive processes that inspire behaviour. Whether we achieve this explicitly or subconsciously, it&#039;s best to drive choice rather than Pavlovian response. 

To this end, I think we need to develop a better understanding of the kinds of mental processes that inspire particular types of behaviour, and then investigate which kinds of communications influence those mental processes.

I&#039;m seeing some fascinating stuff in analytics (and you&#039;re certainly in that group!), but I think this particular &#039;step&#039; in the process remains the one we understand least about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right Phil &#8211; advertising&#8217;s ultimate aim must be to drive bottom-line success. If communications don&#8217;t help an organisation to survive, they are simply a cost to be cut.</p>
<p>However, I still believe that advertising&#8217;s role is to influence the cognitive processes that inspire behaviour. Whether we achieve this explicitly or subconsciously, it&#8217;s best to drive choice rather than Pavlovian response. </p>
<p>To this end, I think we need to develop a better understanding of the kinds of mental processes that inspire particular types of behaviour, and then investigate which kinds of communications influence those mental processes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing some fascinating stuff in analytics (and you&#8217;re certainly in that group!), but I think this particular &#8217;step&#8217; in the process remains the one we understand least about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-146</guid>
		<description>You know you really should consider teaching advertising classes on the side. ;) Really like this post a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know you really should consider teaching advertising classes on the side. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Really like this post a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/communic8/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/?p=974#comment-144</guid>
		<description>wow! that&#039;s really summarizing a lot... great stuff.

just a bit on the measurement side: i still think that the ultimate goal is not just to influence - but to convert that influence/connection an ad or a campaign or a marketing effort has created into actual beahvior.  true - there are a lot of other factors involved - and it is perhaps beyond advertising or communications.  it&#039;s 4Ps (or 5Ps or 6Ps...) after all.  

but if we were not making campaigns that sell and move people to buy and use and reuse a brand [and experience it fully - to its utmost], what then are advertisers spending for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! that&#8217;s really summarizing a lot&#8230; great stuff.</p>
<p>just a bit on the measurement side: i still think that the ultimate goal is not just to influence &#8211; but to convert that influence/connection an ad or a campaign or a marketing effort has created into actual beahvior.  true &#8211; there are a lot of other factors involved &#8211; and it is perhaps beyond advertising or communications.  it&#8217;s 4Ps (or 5Ps or 6Ps&#8230;) after all.  </p>
<p>but if we were not making campaigns that sell and move people to buy and use and reuse a brand [and experience it fully - to its utmost], what then are advertisers spending for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
