one more time

Media planners have long promoted the importance of frequency.

It even features in media vendors’ marketing:

anything-to-anyone

The frequency rationale stems from numerous studies that have shown how repetition helps us remember things.

But does remembering an advert automatically mean that it has been effective?

Consider the frequency with which the intended audience sees this message:

smokingkills1

It’s doubtful whether frequency alone will make this message any more resonant.

So how can we use frequency more effectively?

The answer lies in how we manage people’s expectations.

Repeated exposure to the same thing results in familiarity.

This familiarity can be good or bad, depending on the context.

On the one hand, familiarity makes branding possible: by making a product or service recognisable, people can become familiar with it and remember it.

This familiarity results in certain expectations, and allows us to shortcut certain cognitive processes.

Such shortcutting is very helpful when it comes to making the same decision again and again, but it can also cause problems.

Because when we think we know the answer to something, we tend to spend less time thinking about it.

This has significant implications for advertising.

The law of diminishing returns contends that each additional interaction with a piece of advertising delivers less impact than the previous one.

In other words, if we’ve seen an advert before, we will pay less attention to it on the next encounter.

However, this is only true if we experience what we expect.

If a repeat experience is broadly the same as its predecessor, but also contains an element of variation, it can potentially deliver even greater impact.

This concept might benefit from a musical analogy.

The leitmotiv is common in all types of music, but one of the best examples is Pachelbel‘s “Canon”:

“Canon”‘s appeal lies in the way it evolves over time: a melodic riff repeats throughout the piece, but each repetition of the riff is slightly different.

This variation-on-a-theme approach works equally well in communications, and is central to  some of the world’s most famous  advertising:

absolut-rome

economist-collection

One of the reasons why these campaigns are so effective is that much of the audience’s interpretation of the message is shortcut: because they’ve seen similar communications before, they already understand what each new creative is trying to tell them.

However, the variation on the creative theme gently challenges their expectations, allowing the brand to refresh its relationship with them.

So, when you’re planning frequency, don’t just think in terms of repetition: constantly repeating the same thing is much less effective than delivering numerous variations on a similar theme.

The Thais express the optimum approach beautifully:

Same same, but different.”

.

SMRT advert from the print copy of this | Smoking Kills image from here | Absolut adverts from here, here, here, and here | Economist adverts from here and here.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s





Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers

%d bloggers like this: